From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 12 16:54:33 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D1E616A412 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 16:54:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx22.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CF48C13C46C for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 16:54:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 22051 invoked by uid 399); 12 Jan 2007 16:54:30 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?192.168.0.5?) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 12 Jan 2007 16:54:30 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 Message-ID: <45A7BD3E.8080002@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 08:54:22 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jo Rhett References: <71676476-017C-4861-8713-2B200C63E709@svcolo.com> In-Reply-To: <71676476-017C-4861-8713-2B200C63E709@svcolo.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rcorder doesn't apply to ports startup scripts in 6.0? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 16:54:33 -0000 Jo Rhett wrote: > I'd just like to confirm that rcorder wasn't implemented until 6.1, right? Scot's answer was correct here in terms of timing. If you're looking for a big round number, 6.1-RELEASE is good enough. > So all of the ports which are being updated to use rcorder are now > breaking on all of the existing 6.0 systems... Not broken, they'll just work the same way they worked on 5.x. The rcorder will look like this: stuff ... localpkg ... more stuff Ports were already using rc.d before I added the support to run them in the overall order, but we were a little bit constrained on what we could do with them since they all ran at the same exact place in the boot process, and couldn't affect anything earlier than that. hth Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection