From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 9 22:21:49 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE753106584E for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2009 22:21:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx22.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 390F88FC1C for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2009 22:21:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 20903 invoked by uid 399); 9 Feb 2009 22:21:41 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?192.168.0.19?) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTPAM; 9 Feb 2009 22:21:41 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-Sender: dougb@dougbarton.us Message-ID: <4990AC6D.4030508@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 14:21:33 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kostik Belousov References: <1233007263.9302.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20090129233220.1ed64e6d@zelda.local> <498EB79F.4010905@FreeBSD.org> <4990A73D.6060108@FreeBSD.org> <20090209221930.GI9427@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> In-Reply-To: <20090209221930.GI9427@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UFS Witness LoR + 5 other LoRs X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 22:21:52 -0000 Kostik Belousov wrote: > On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 01:59:25PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: >> Kris Kennaway wrote: >>> Several of these are widely reported, and harmless >> Given that we're coming closer and closer to the time when 8.x will be >> in pre-release slush, shouldn't at least some of these get fixed >> soonish? If for no other reason than to make it easier to detect real >> problems when they arise. > > Fix for most often reported LOR between user map and vnode lock, typically > UFS, was committed yesterday. Excellent! Can't wait to give this a roll. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection