From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 3 22:41:47 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 667C316A4CF for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 22:41:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2DD143D45 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 22:41:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linicks@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 40so255297rnz for ; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 14:41:43 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=QeYYTvZMRfiSndJATC93WbSOlN2So8tRPo9+w2O2LrBKnBmmf+n9jKzMIj8xuBLikxDTPYuKuvtRfFWlUpphcFaYZCplpQ1TS1kbd28JJv8r8wCgc3RTw7jVVn5qLi+jKxfSM/9CGeNzdAQ6vNUNpOEazP4BiCmsfkRMei7qb9c= Received: by 10.38.8.49 with SMTP id 49mr30563rnh; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 14:41:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.8.20 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 14:41:43 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 15:41:43 -0700 From: Nick Pavlica To: Nathan Vidican In-Reply-To: <000001c50a3c$50f2eba0$6800000a@r3140ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <000001c50a3c$50f2eba0$6800000a@r3140ca> cc: amd64@freebsd.org cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Intel EMT64 Xeon vs AMD Opteron X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Nick Pavlica List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 22:41:47 -0000 I think this would depend on your application, but I have hear allot of good things about AMD 64. --Nick On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 17:04:21 -0500, Nathan Vidican wrote: > Hey all, > > Just looking for general opinions and/or advice regarding use of one over > the other. > > Cost wise, AMD Opteron 246 is roughly the same cost as a 3.0Ghz Xeon ... But > how do they compare performance wise; specifically related to FreeBSD? > > (Not subscribed to both lists I sent this to, please reply directly via > email and cc the list if you could - thanks) > > -- > Nathan Vidican > nvidican@wmptl.com > Windsor Match Plate & Tool Ltd. > http://www.wmptl.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >