From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 4 11:41:14 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4F0637B401 for ; Mon, 4 Aug 2003 11:41:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from h00609772adf0.ne.client2.attbi.com (h00609772adf0.ne.client2.attbi.com [66.31.45.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B47A543FCB for ; Mon, 4 Aug 2003 11:41:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rodrigc@crodrigues.org) Received: from h00609772adf0.ne.client2.attbi.com (localhost.ne.attbi.com [127.0.0.1])h74Igmlg041370 for ; Mon, 4 Aug 2003 14:42:49 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from rodrigc@h00609772adf0.ne.client2.attbi.com) Received: (from rodrigc@localhost)h74IgmAv041369 for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Mon, 4 Aug 2003 14:42:48 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 14:42:48 -0400 From: Craig Rodrigues To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20030804184248.GA41334@crodrigues.org> References: <3F2D1713.9060806@liwing.de> <20030803181735.GC6331@cicely12.cicely.de> <20030804140822.GU6331@cicely12.cicely.de> <3F2EA5AD.E4C73C6@mindspring.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3F2EA5AD.E4C73C6@mindspring.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Subject: Re: INET6 in world X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2003 18:41:15 -0000 On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 11:27:57AM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: > > That's chicken/egg - IPv6 never will be widely used if everyone thinks > > that way. > > The problem, as I see it, is that it doesn't come enabled by > default on Windows systems. Until it does, it's never going > to get any traction. > > I wouldn't be surprised if the government has asked Microsoft > to not deploy it, or to deploy it without encryption support, > given world events. The government is pushing IPv6, but from a different direction: http://www.fcw.com/fcw/articles/2003/0609/web-dodip-06-13-03.asp http://www.defenselink.mil/transcripts/2003/tr20030613-0274.html In the U.S., this will probably push many vendors to become "IPv6-compatible". -- Craig Rodrigues http://crodrigues.org rodrigc@crodrigues.org