Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 12 Apr 2006 19:42:25 -0300
From:      AT Matik <>
Subject:   Re: Load-balancing
Message-ID:  <>
In-Reply-To: <>
References:  <20060411092932.42148fd8@giboia> <> <>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On Wednesday 12 April 2006 19:13, Patrick Tracanelli wrote:
> Also, what about some sort of algorith more similar to "plr" for "prob"
> action? As my understanding prob is really a probability, which does not
> mean say 33% of the packets will match (while plr says it will match -
> and drop the packet), it means 33% of probability, right? This would be
> different of 33% of matching rate. Lets think of a "rate" option for
> "matching rate", a

"probably" not a good choice to generate packet-loss when trying kind of lo=

prob generates random rate (fwd in this case)
plr generates random packet _loss_ rate=20

I think the latter option create artificial kind of bw limit


A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura.
Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <>