From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Mar 7 19: 4:16 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from dhcp9547172.columbus.rr.com (dhcp9547172.columbus.rr.com [24.95.47.172]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5921F14DEB for ; Sun, 7 Mar 1999 19:04:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rowland@dhcp9547172.columbus.rr.com) Received: (from rowland@localhost) by dhcp9547172.columbus.rr.com (8.9.2/8.9.2) id WAA11793; Sun, 7 Mar 1999 22:02:02 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from rowland) To: Nate Williams Cc: alk@pobox.com, robert@kudra.com, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: base64 References: <14048.10089.598598.919239@avalon.east> <36E07AEC.101F3467@newsguy.com> <14048.48864.918087.631128@avalon.east> <19990306095927.B53145@kudra.com> <14049.29637.311448.247778@avalon.east> <199903080209.TAA28284@mt.sri.com> X-Face: "<|%>c@Vfv/8}+Av1z:R5sDzf!3QVer!n\,.&+&h\k1,BHAoyw8Gp10<-SqZ<*"|!U!a#xg6ls?1,Vj$m@r?uHcfB,'i:LLgtyb;~}O8v7zZThuB`X~#IE{v*"PhI]cl/>&ys(MGa%y:6~TuHFw&~|V?!9HZ_R"<}dC5D:%igP2Q6ZJex,P0M From: Shaun Rowland Date: 07 Mar 1999 22:02:01 -0500 In-Reply-To: Nate Williams's message of "Sun, 7 Mar 1999 19:09:32 -0700" Message-ID: <87bti4fzva.fsf@dhcp9547172.columbus.rr.com> Lines: 34 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/XEmacs 20.4 - "Emerald" Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Nate Williams writes: > > Finally, there is *NO* way to distribute a standard MIME client that > will not add bloat. I use XEmacs + VM, alot of people use Pine, others > use ELM, others mush, others who knows what. > > None of them are 'best' to be shipped with FreeBSD. I can agree with this. It makes sense... but below: > MIME attachments are *NOT* the standard form of email used on the > internet. As a matter of fact, I would venture to guess that 99% of the > email traffic on the internet does not contain MIME attachments. Many > ISP's are now refusing to accept MIME attachments due to the spreading > of virus's and SPAM. MIME attachments are extensions to the SMTP protocol, and are as such definitely standards. They *ARE* standard extensions, and thus forms of email used on the Internet. I have not heard of any ISPs blocking MIME attachments either. That is not only ridiculous, but rather stupid and a bad decision from a business standpoint. The use of MIME attachments is also much higher than 1%... I would venture to guess. SPAM has nothing to do with MIME either. Not only is MIME a part of email, but Usenet and the Web. Read some RFCs. As the name implies, what you have said above is is not correct. -- Shaun Rowland rowland@cis.ohio-state.edu IICF System Administrator DL798 http://www.cis.ohio-state.edu/~rowland To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message