From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 4 10:36:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65F8316A4CE for ; Sat, 4 Sep 2004 10:36:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from av1-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (av1-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net [81.228.9.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F1C743D3F for ; Sat, 4 Sep 2004 10:36:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from daniel_k_eriksson@telia.com) Received: by av1-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 77C3537EF3; Sat, 4 Sep 2004 12:35:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp1-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (smtp1-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net [81.228.9.177]) by av1-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65B5637E4A; Sat, 4 Sep 2004 12:35:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gadget (h130n1fls11o822.telia.com [213.64.66.130]) by smtp1-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 446C33800E; Sat, 4 Sep 2004 12:35:59 +0200 (CEST) From: "Daniel Eriksson" To: "'John-Mark Gurney'" , Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2004 12:33:53 +0200 Organization: Home Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 In-Reply-To: <20040825175250.GO29902@funkthat.com> Thread-Index: AcSK5KNLWPySpqwHTTuEuV7Qvx7uxQHhTM+g X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Subject: RE: if_re locking patch... X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2004 10:36:00 -0000 John-Mark Gurney wrote: > To expand upon the patch posted previously, I have cribbed bms's rl > locking, and ported it to re. This makes the interrupt MPSAFE along > with the rest of the driver. No more GIANT LOCKED messages for re. :) I saw that this was committed to HEAD yesterday. I have a machine with a 8169-based NIC that is doing ~300GB on a daily basis that I'd love to try to run with debug.mpsafenet=1. Do you think the patch that went into HEAD has been tested enough that it is safe to try it? It's a UP machine using POLLING mode (HZ=2000), if that makes any difference. /Daniel Eriksson