Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 23:05:51 +0200 (CEST) From: "Eivind Hestnes" <eivind@stabbursmoen.no> To: "Max Laier" <max@love2party.net> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeVRRPd project status Message-ID: <55441.80.203.112.249.1112648751.squirrel@webmail.stabbursmoen.no> In-Reply-To: <200504042143.09216.max@love2party.net> References: <425196F0.4020309@x-trader.de> <200504042143.09216.max@love2party.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Perhaps offtopic, but could be FYI: I recently configured two FreeBSD 5.3 boxes (patched w/CARP support) to act as one logic router (preemption) between multiple VLANs. The router has now been in production for two weeks (under heavy load, too), and I have not run into any problems what-so-ever. Failover is almost transparent, and the robustness is awesome. The configuration itself is rather minimal as everything is done in rc.conf. If you are looking for a Open Source failover solution, CARP is probably the best choice as it stands today. If you need assistance with the configuration, please reply to the list, and I will try to respond. Best regards, Eivind Hestnes Max Laier sa: > On Monday 04 April 2005 21:35, Markus Oestreicher wrote: >> Good Day, >> >> Does anyone know the current status of the FreeVRRPd project? >> >> www.b0l.org and cvs.b0l.org seem to be dead. >> >> Has anyone checked out the last CVS version before it died? > > Sorry, can't help with that, but if you don't need VRRP but a working > redundancy setup, you should look at CARP which is part of 6-CURRENT and > 5-STABLE since a couple of weeks and will be part of 5.4-RELEASE. > > http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=carp&manpath=FreeBSD+6.0-current > > -- > /"\ Best regards, | mlaier@freebsd.org > \ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 > X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier@EFnet > / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?55441.80.203.112.249.1112648751.squirrel>