From owner-freebsd-arch Wed Jul 12 5:55:59 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from peach.ocn.ne.jp (peach.ocn.ne.jp [210.145.254.87]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FDAA37BE22; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 05:55:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dcs@newsguy.com) Received: from newsguy.com (p40-dn02kiryunisiki.gunma.ocn.ne.jp [211.0.245.105]) by peach.ocn.ne.jp (8.9.1a/OCN/) with ESMTP id VAA00366; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 21:55:07 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <396C6626.28389C44@newsguy.com> Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 21:35:50 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en,pt-BR,ja MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Narvi Cc: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group , obrien@FreeBSD.ORG, Sheldon Hearn , arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Bringing LPRng into FreeBSD? - License Issues References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Narvi wrote: > > And at least IMHO bind is not an optional component. But pccard, ctm, > isdn, and several others are. I do not use bind, but I can't even boot multiuser without pccard. -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org capo@the.great.underground.bsdconpiracy.org _DES: The Book of Bruce has only one sentence in it, and it says "the actual directives of my cult are left as an exercise for the reader. Good luck." jkh: does it really include the 'good luck' part? EE: OK, I made that part up. EE: I figured it should sound a bit more cheery than how Bruce initially dictated it to me. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message