From owner-freebsd-current Wed Jun 9 23:35:45 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from alpo.whistle.com (alpo.whistle.com [207.76.204.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45BC714E9B for ; Wed, 9 Jun 1999 23:35:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@whistle.com) Received: from current1.whistle.com (current1.whistle.com [207.76.205.22]) by alpo.whistle.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with SMTP id XAA93384; Wed, 9 Jun 1999 23:35:39 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 9 Jun 1999 23:35:37 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer To: Tony Finch Cc: jobaldwi@vt.edu, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: GNU patch gone stale In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG TONY!!!! they just showed your obfuscated C entry in the COmpetitionhere.. Your'e crazy you know.. there were soma amazing entries but you came in near the top.. there was the 2K obfuscated X11 flight simulator that actually worked.. the 1500 byte program that produced gzip'd postscript of a 3 maze, and your 2k program that produces an 800K program that actually works.. as I said.. "you're crazy" (but wear it with pride!) julian On Wed, 9 Jun 1999, Tony Finch wrote: > John Baldwin wrote: > > > >So it would seem that patch and cvs don't interact at all, unless it's a > >question of patch 2.5 being able to apply diffs generated by cvs diff. > > That is the main problem I have with patch 2.5 -- it completely fails > to apply patches from `cvs diff` unless you have a really new cvs, and > I usually don't. > > Tony. > -- > f.a.n.finch dot@dotat.at fanf@demon.net black dog > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message