From owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 13 06:55:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4667C16A4CE; Thu, 13 May 2004 06:55:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from grosbein.pp.ru (grgw.svzserv.kemerovo.su [213.184.64.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5781643D55; Thu, 13 May 2004 06:55:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.pp.ru) Received: from grosbein.pp.ru (eugen@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by grosbein.pp.ru (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i4DDtdZh013245; Thu, 13 May 2004 21:55:39 +0800 (KRAST) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.pp.ru) Received: (from eugen@localhost) by grosbein.pp.ru (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i4DDtdsT013244; Thu, 13 May 2004 21:55:39 +0800 (KRAST) (envelope-from eugen) Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 21:55:39 +0800 From: Eugene Grosbein To: Luigi Rizzo Message-ID: <20040513135539.GA13211@grosbein.pp.ru> References: <40A3393F.1391943E@kuzbass.ru> <20040513012344.A12373@xorpc.icir.org> <40A34082.F0182B31@kuzbass.ru> <20040513013717.A16394@xorpc.icir.org> <40A345F9.1460F5C4@kuzbass.ru> <20040513064856.B42908@xorpc.icir.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040513064856.B42908@xorpc.icir.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: ipfw@freebsd.org cc: net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipfw: reset tcp X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 13:55:44 -0000 On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 06:48:56AM -0700, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > 2.- all other firewall-generated TCP packets (rst and keepalives) > go through send_pkt() and then bypass the firewall. > The only way we could safely go through the firewall again is > to make sure that we never send a RST in response to a RST (need > to add an additional check in O_REJECT). > > Give me a few days (i.e. ping me again on monday!) to come up with > a safe patch to do this, which does not rely on the programmer to > DTRT and avoid loops. Thanks a lot! Eugene