From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Nov 24 13: 3:34 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01BDC37B404; Sun, 24 Nov 2002 13:03:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from rutger.owt.com (rutger.owt.com [204.118.6.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82EBC43E9C; Sun, 24 Nov 2002 13:03:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from owt.com (owt-207-41-94-232.owt.com [207.41.94.232]) by rutger.owt.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA19328; Sun, 24 Nov 2002 13:03:25 -0800 Message-ID: <3DE13E9B.3060003@owt.com> Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 13:03:23 -0800 From: Kent Stewart User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0 X-Accept-Language: en-us, es-mx MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dmitry Morozovsky Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG, gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Port INDEX dependency list incompletes References: <20021124174916.Q57190-100000@woozle.rinet.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, Kent Stewart wrote: > > KS> You can't use "portsdb -U" right now. You have to > KS> > KS> cd /usr/ports > KS> make index > KS> portsdb -u > > Actually, you can, but you have to be a bit lucky ;) My sub-port collection > contains approx 350 ports, and portsdb -U fails in roughly 50% of runs. > > Unfortunately, portsdb -U did not even return non-zero exit status for this > weird case > > And, for the cause, I'm almost sure it is due to some intercommunications with > bsd.gnome.mk, as *every* sub-port collection without gnome ports survives > portsdb -U every time. > I am not seeing that behavior. I was also lucky because I don't appear to have any installed ports with a portsdb -U caused problem. The first port that I saw with a dependancy problem was Net-SSH-Perl. I don't see a gnome dependancy in its ?-deps lists. When you look at the INDEX entry for Net-SSH-Perl, you have a very long line. It wouldn't surprise me if the problem is nothing more than the dimension of an array is exceeded when portsdb is generating the entry. The gnome related ?-deps lists also have a very long line. Kent -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message