Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2003 14:08:34 -0600 From: "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@scsiguy.com> To: Kern Sibbald <kern@sibbald.com>, freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Cc: mjacob@feral.com Subject: Re: SCSI tape data loss Message-ID: <2846020000.1054498114@aslan.scsiguy.com> In-Reply-To: <1054490081.1582.1685.camel@rufus> References: <1054490081.1582.1685.camel@rufus>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Hello, > > I'm the author of a GPL'ed network backup program called > Bacula (www.bacula.org). For the last three years, it > has been working flawlessly on Solaris and Linux systems. > When users attempted to use it recently on FreeBSD, > it did not work. I subsequently modified Bacula so that > it would work on FreeBSD -- basically, I had to program > around some important differences in the way FreeBSD > handles EOFs compared to Solaris and Linux. At some point > in the future, I would like to discuss the problems > I had in detail, if that interests you. I would be interested as I'm sure would other readers of this list. > We've now worked on this problem for several weeks, and > I believe we have now isolated the problem (data loss) to occur > when the end of medium is reached. > > We have now confirmed that Bacula correctly wrote > to the tape, but when it was read back 13 blocks > of 64512 bytes were missing. > > Below, I have listed in pseudo-language what > Bacula was doing. Each write with the exception > of the first block on the second tape is 64512 > bytes: > > first tape mounted > write(block 1) > ... > write(block 1554); > write(block 1555); <=== block lost > ... <=== blocks lost > write(block 1567); <=== block lost > write(block 1568) failed because of EOM detected > ioctl(MTIOCERRSTAT); What was the residual reported by MTIOCERRSTAT? If the device is in buffered mode, that residual can be larger than the last transaction that was failed. My guess is that either MTIOCERRSTAT is not properly pulling the residual out of the info field, or you are not backing up far enough in the data stream when the EOM occurs. > I have verified that Bacula did successfully write 1567 blocks to the > first tape, but in reading back the tape, blocks 1555-1567 are not > on the tape. > > Now, the big question is: what caused the loss of those blocks? > The most likely causes I can think of are: > > 1. Bacula is doing something (e.g. MTIOCERRSTAT, or the MTBSF) > to cause the data to be lost. If this is the case, it is > something specific to FreeBSD since this sequence of commands > works on both Solaris and Linux (except that MTIOCERRSTAT is > MTIOCLRERR on those systems). Perhaps both Linux and Solaris force the tape drives to run in unbuffered mode? > 2. The SCSI driver is doing asynchronous writes (very bad) and > the End of Medium is not sent to Bacula until many writes after > the end of the tape. Disabling the tape drive's write buffer kills performance. All of the information required to handle buffered writes should be available to you. Perhaps we should also implement the MTCACHE/MTNOCACHE opcodes so that userland apps can control this. It's not clear if this is exactly what they were created for, but it may be better to use these than to add some other opcodes. > 3. The SCSI driver has some sort of bug that causes buffers to be > lost. I doubt that this would occur only at EOM. -- Justin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2846020000.1054498114>