From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Dec 29 02:47:51 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id CAA16751 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Tue, 29 Dec 1998 02:47:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from axl.noc.iafrica.com (axl.noc.iafrica.com [196.31.1.175]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id CAA16746 for ; Tue, 29 Dec 1998 02:47:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sheldonh@axl.noc.iafrica.com) Received: from sheldonh (helo=axl.noc.iafrica.com) by axl.noc.iafrica.com with local-esmtp (Exim 2.10 #1) id 0zuwgL-0001NG-00 for ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 29 Dec 1998 12:47:21 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn To: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: ports that don't honour local CFLAGS Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1998 12:47:21 +0200 Message-ID: <5285.914928441@axl.noc.iafrica.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi folks, I'm becoming increasingly annoyed by the number of ports in the tree that ignore local CFLAGS for no good reason. I can accept that there are ports which need to add to CFLAGS. I can even accept that some ports may need to completely replace CFLAGS with their own values. However, I propose that commiters should refuse to commit submitted ports that don't honour local CFLAGS without good reason. Instead, they should send submitters e-mail saying "either fix your port to honour local CFLAGS or justify the current behaviour". Obviously, existing ports that are "broken" in this respect should be fixed through PR's submitted by people like me whom they annoy. This proposal will simply ensure that the number of such ports doesn't grow, which means that the problem is manageable and will eventually go away. Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message