Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 18:11:03 +0200 From: Andrea Venturoli <ml@netfence.it> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Port system "problems" Message-ID: <4FE9DF17.1020304@netfence.it> In-Reply-To: <20120626162055.0b2bdb0d@gumby.homeunix.com> References: <4FE8E4A4.9070507@gmail.com> <20120626065732.GH41054@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <20120626092645.Horde.HytQbVNNcXdP6WQ1aMtjoMA@webmail.df.eu> <4FE96BA0.6040005@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4FE97008.2060501@netfence.it> <4FE97AE1.9080109@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4FE9817C.7020905@netfence.it> <4FE99200.7050107@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20120626130715.Horde.eb3fPtjz9kRP6ZfjA7sSFoA@webmail.df.eu> <4FE9AB85.3070106@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20120626162055.0b2bdb0d@gumby.homeunix.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 06/26/12 17:20, RW wrote: > In my experience most of he time is spent building This is not necessarily true. Try X.Org (with all its very small ports) or MIMEDefang (depending on gobs of p5- ports) or anything else alike. You'll find out a good share of the total time is spent maintaining pkgdb and other administrativia. bye av.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4FE9DF17.1020304>