Date: Tue, 24 Oct 1995 04:40:47 +0300 (MSK) From: =?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?= (aka Andrey A. Chernov, Black Mage) <ache@astral.msk.su> To: ache@freefall.freebsd.org, John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, gibbs@freefall.freebsd.org, terry@lambert.org Subject: Re: ld.so, LD_NOSTD_PATH, and suid/sgid programs Message-ID: <GaVG4Zm0P1@ache.dialup.demos.ru> In-Reply-To: <m0t7Y8B-000078C@seattle.polstra.com>; from John Polstra at Mon, 23 Oct 95 18:26 PDT References: <m0t7Y8B-000078C@seattle.polstra.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <m0t7Y8B-000078C@seattle.polstra.com> John Polstra writes: >> And most interesting thing is that LD_NOSTD_PATH not works at all yet. >> You can check it by setting LD_NOSTD_PATH, nothing happens then. >> I.e. you can still run all shared binaries with STD path. :-) >Yes. That is because ld.so still uses the hints file even when >LD_NOSTD_PATH is set. If it finds a needed library in ld.so.hints, it >will use it. >I'm not arguing that this behavior is correct; I'm just explaining >what's going on. Doing my fix I assume it will be implemented correctly in future, i.e. like Sun variable with same name does. Why the same name needed in other case? -- Andrey A. Chernov : And I rest so composedly, /Now, in my bed, ache@astral.msk.su : That any beholder /Might fancy me dead - http://dt.demos.su/~ache : Might start at beholding me, /Thinking me dead. RELCOM Team,FreeBSD Team : E.A.Poe From "For Annie" 1849
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?GaVG4Zm0P1>