Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 16:40:09 -0700 (MST) From: Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com> To: obrien@FreeBSD.org Cc: Peter Wemm <peter@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/crypto/openssl/apps speed.c src/crypto/openssl/crypto/err err_all.c src/crypto/openssl/crypto/rsa rsa_stubs.c rsa.h rsa_eay.c rsa_lib.c src/crypto/openssl/rsaref rsar_err.c rsaref.c rsaref.h src/secure/lib Makefile src/secure/lib/libcrypto Makefile ... Message-ID: <200002282340.QAA21856@nomad.yogotech.com> In-Reply-To: <20000228152810.B20940@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <200002261306.PAA26436@internat.freebsd.org> <20000228152810.B20940@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Sat, Feb 26, 2000 at 03:06:58PM +0200, Peter Wemm wrote: > > or package) or (if you don't fear RSA Inc) use the (superior) > > International rsa_eay.c code. > ... > > 1.2 +2 -1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/rsa/rsa_eay.c > > > > Log: > > Merge from internat.freebsd.org repo, minus change to rsa_eay.c (missing) > > > Reorganize and unify libcrypto's interface so that the RSA implementation > > is chosen at runtime via dlopen(). > > > Since it is not illegal for me (a USA-citizen in the USA) to have the > "international" RSA code, why is it we don't have the full OpenSSL code > in the Freefall repository? That way things are kept more in sync and > on 21-Sept-2000 all I change is a symbol and I have the superior code. Because it's illegal for you, a USA-citizen, to use the international RSA code due to licensing (not export) laws. Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200002282340.QAA21856>