Date: Tue, 16 Dec 1997 11:54:03 GMT From: jak@cetlink.net (John Kelly) To: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> Cc: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>, FreeBSD Hackers <hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: 3com 3c509 card Message-ID: <349867a9.37744789@mail.cetlink.net> In-Reply-To: <19971216195304.56154@lemis.com> References: <199712160840.TAA01580@word.smith.net.au> <34974fcb.31632460@mail.cetlink.net> <19971216195304.56154@lemis.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 16 Dec 1997 19:53:04 +1030, Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> wrote: >> I tested with an FTP transfer and consumed about 45% CPU in both >> cases. > >That's a lot of CPU. It was an FTP upload. A download consumed less CPU. >What kind of CPU is it? 486 DX4-100. >How much user time did it use? With an 8 meg file upload, user CPU was less than 3%, while interrupt CPU varied between 25% - 35% and system CPU varied between 25% - 35%. Downloading the same file, total CPU was only 35%, with interrupt no more than about 10%. John
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?349867a9.37744789>