Date: Fri, 6 Dec 1996 11:00:00 -0500 (EST) From: John Dyson <dyson@dyson.iquest.net> To: bde@zeta.org.au (Bruce Evans) Cc: bde@zeta.org.au, current@freebsd.org, markm@iafrica.com Subject: Re: 3.0-current Kernel panicking on bootup Message-ID: <199612061600.LAA07810@dyson.iquest.net> In-Reply-To: <199612061542.CAA28965@godzilla.zeta.org.au> from "Bruce Evans" at Dec 7, 96 02:42:46 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >* #define LKM ACTUALLY_LKM_NOT_KERNEL > > Don't use that. It will go away. > Didn't know. > > >Those that use LKM's, will have a perf hit. Kind of like shared libs. > > I think it needs to be a positive option so that it fails safely. > Okay, then make it conditional on the various processors that support it? As opposed to the processor that doesn't? John
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199612061600.LAA07810>