Date: Mon, 08 Feb 1999 13:49:36 -0700 From: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org> To: Martin Cracauer <cracauer@cons.org> Cc: Martin Cracauer <cracauer@cons.org>, chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 100Mbit ethernet card comparision Message-ID: <4.1.19990208134903.00bd9320@mail.lariat.org> In-Reply-To: <19990208205534.A9430@cons.org> References: <4.1.19990208120931.04582e90@mail.lariat.org> <4.1.19990208115114.0457c800@mail.lariat.org> <19990208145325.A8384@cons.org> <4.1.19990208115114.0457c800@mail.lariat.org> <19990208200523.A9112@cons.org> <4.1.19990208120931.04582e90@mail.lariat.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 08:55 PM 2/8/99 +0100, Martin Cracauer wrote: >Yes, but throughput is mimimized. Ah.... I see. I was looking at your CPU usage figures and thinking that the first column indicated throughput. --Brett "Rules? This is the Internet." -- Dan Gillmor To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.1.19990208134903.00bd9320>