Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 22 Apr 2008 10:37:56 +1000
From:      Emil Mikulic <emikulic@gmail.com>
To:        Steven Schlansker <stevenschlansker@berkeley.edu>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: [SO]HO Software RAID5 server: which implementation should I choice?
Message-ID:  <20080422003756.GA15927@dmr.ath.cx>
In-Reply-To: <480CF344.8020906@berkeley.edu>
References:  <396418019.20080409104542@serebryakov.spb.ru> <47FCBAFB.9060508@tzim.net> <4956a5e50804191912g52833c35q868827dc2b54e5ae@mail.gmail.com> <480AE7AA.5090204@tzim.net> <480B9373.50603@quip.cz> <480CF344.8020906@berkeley.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 01:04:20PM -0700, Steven Schlansker wrote:
> I'm also running ZFS and wanted to share my experiences.  It doesn't
> cope well with low-memory environments, but I've successfully run with
> 2GB ram and 3TB disk with no problems on both i386 and amd64.  amd64
> needs a little bit of tuning - increasing kmem and whatnot (well
> documented, not very difficult/stressful)

Since pjd's nokva commit, I have had zero panics on amd64,
with no tuning whatsoever.

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/vm/vm_kern.c.diff?r1=1.130;r2=1.131



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080422003756.GA15927>