From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 1 00:33:56 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0DA416A4BF for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2003 00:33:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from student.uci.agh.edu.pl (student.uci.agh.edu.pl [149.156.98.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFA6643F75 for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2003 00:33:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from winfried@student.uci.agh.edu.pl) Received: by student.uci.agh.edu.pl (Postfix, from userid 25828) id E7D8564624; Mon, 1 Sep 2003 09:33:52 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2003 09:33:52 +0200 From: Jan Srzednicki To: Soren Schmidt Message-ID: <20030901073352.GB6853@student.agh.edu.pl> References: <20030831112521.GG61234@oak.rpg.pl> <200308311457.h7VEvv5j003195@spider.deepcore.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200308311457.h7VEvv5j003195@spider.deepcore.dk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ATAng not detecting drives X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: w@dream.vg List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2003 07:33:56 -0000 On Sun, Aug 31, 2003 at 04:57:57PM +0200, Soren Schmidt wrote: > It seems Jan Srzednicki wrote: > > ad0: 19546MB [39714/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA66 > > ad1: 39093MB [79428/16/63] at ata0-slave UDMA66 > > ata1-slave: FAILURE - ATA_IDENTIFY status=51 > > error=4 > > acd0: CDROM at ata1-master UDMA33 > > cd0 at ata1 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 > > cd0: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-0 device > > cd0: 33.000MB/s transfers > > cd0: cd present [2154583490 x 838860800 byte records] > > Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s2a > > > > (it's this ata1-slave thing). > > Previously, it has been seen as: > > > > acd1: CD-RW at ata1-slave UDMA33 > > Ok, I've finally managed to get a setup that exhibits this problem, > expect a fix soon... Anyway, the syncer problem (giving up on just one buffer) appeared again, this time without any heavy disk loads. I'm sure it hasn't been happening before the upgrade, yet I have no idea how can I provide more feedback about it. -- -- wrzask --= v =-- Winfried --===-- GG# 3838383 --- -- w@dream.vg --- w@303.krakow.pl --===-- http://violent.dream.vg/ --- --=< Ride the wild wind - push the envelope, don't sit on the fence, --- -- Ride the wild wind - live life on the razor's edge! >=-- Queen --