From owner-freebsd-alpha Tue Jan 6 09:26:42 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id JAA02533 for alpha-outgoing; Tue, 6 Jan 1998 09:26:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA02493 for ; Tue, 6 Jan 1998 09:25:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.6.9) with ESMTP id JAA00710; Tue, 6 Jan 1998 09:25:42 -0800 (PST) To: Jim King cc: freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Alpha port.. In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 06 Jan 1998 07:05:33 CST." <3.0.2.32.19980106070533.006dfc50@mail.sstar.com> Date: Tue, 06 Jan 1998 09:25:42 -0800 Message-ID: <707.884107542@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > At 03:28 AM 1/6/98 -0800, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > >Well, it's a new year - what do we want to do with this baby - drown > >it, feed it or continue to ignore it? ;-) > > I'd still like to see an Alpha version of FreeBSD. After looking into > NetBSD and OpenBSD (my Multia is running OpenBSD) I'd have to say that they > fall short in a couple areas where FreeBSD works well for me. And I'm sure you're not alone in wanting to see that happen. The question here seems more to be one of who we're going to line up to actually *do* that. :) Jordan