Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 19:16:54 -0500 From: Paul Murphy <pnmurphy@cogeco.ca> To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Where is FreeBSD going? Message-ID: <20040106191654.55a20157@earth.upton.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0401061413200.17348-100000@pancho> References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0401061413200.17348-100000@pancho>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Signature=_Tue__6_Jan_2004_19_16_54_-0500_gly2Zqr3KLQw.9o8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 6 Jan 2004 14:17:38 -0600 (CST) Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> wrote: > > Alas, the problem is that the FreeBSD developers do not attach > > appropriate value to advocacy. Contributions in the form of advocacy > > are virtually unvalued relative to contributions in the form of > > code. > > IMHO what you're seeing is not this, but instead, frustration from > the developers in feeling that the advocacy discussions less often > bear concrete results than code contributions. > > If you don't think the advocacy efforts are good enough, please > come up with something concrete, propose it on -advocacy, and > see if you can get volunteers to sign on to help. > > mcl > "Submit a patch" ;) -- Cogeco ergo sum --Signature=_Tue__6_Jan_2004_19_16_54_-0500_gly2Zqr3KLQw.9o8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/+0/7Tv5Mxsi/WPMRAvfXAJ9sGz8Ncw3U1dPxrzxq0MOKQqgmIACgqx7U oKKGpT1ToV6ez1982iTIc6E= =CAF7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Tue__6_Jan_2004_19_16_54_-0500_gly2Zqr3KLQw.9o8--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040106191654.55a20157>