Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 9 Aug 2004 13:45:52 +0000 (UTC)
From:      "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>
To:        Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net>
Cc:        FreeBSD current mailing list <current@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: IPSec + 5.2.current Problem
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.53.0408091338520.1709@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net>
In-Reply-To: <20040809153341.24963cfd@Magellan.Leidinger.net>
References:  <200408080622.i786Mnhe017474@www1.pochta.ru> <20040808132524.GB1033@mehnert.org><20040809112700.GB659@mehnert.org> <20040809150754.13ca108a@Magellan.Leidinger.net> <Pine.BSF.4.53.0408091314260.1709@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net> <20040809153341.24963cfd@Magellan.Leidinger.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 9 Aug 2004, Alexander Leidinger wrote:

> On Mon, 9 Aug 2004 13:21:01 +0000 (UTC)
> "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> wrote:
>
> > > > I also had some problems with IPSEC and IPSEC_ESP, changing require
> > > > to use in the policies fixed that. With require racoon was not able
> > > > to initiate phase 1, because all non esp traffic was dropped.
> >
> > whyever I hadn't seen this posting.
>
> Did you noticed Message-Id:
> <20040805223027.7df0732b@Magellan.Leidinger.net> on -current?

I had seen that mail but I cannot see this paragraph in there. anyway..

>
> > > I think this is a datapoint... I use a "require" policy too. ATM I can't
> > > test with "use" instead.
> >
> > but this problem had been fixed months ago for IPSEC.
>
> Any other idea for the cause of the observed behavior?

which on ? use vs. require ? I think this is just not HEAD.

your problem: do you really need gif(4) ? if yes - what for ?

-- 
Bjoern A. Zeeb				bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.53.0408091338520.1709>