From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Wed Jan 25 10:39:52 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 757B2CBFC8E; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 10:39:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@FreeBSD.org) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (prod2.absolight.net [79.143.243.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "plouf.absolight.net", Issuer "CAcert Class 3 Root" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11024F77; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 10:39:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@FreeBSD.org) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88362BDC9B; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 11:39:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from atuin.in.mat.cc (atuin.in.mat.cc [79.143.241.205]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 113E5BDCA4; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 11:39:50 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: 11.0-RC1 unsupported by ports? To: ticso@cicely.de, Kurt Jaeger References: <20170125042413.GK85666@cicely7.cicely.de> <20170125062045.GS13006@home.opsec.eu> <20170125075459.GL85666@cicely7.cicely.de> <20170125081318.GT13006@home.opsec.eu> <20170125084738.GM85666@cicely7.cicely.de> Cc: Bernd Walter , freebsd-arm@freebsd.org, Kurt Jaeger , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Mathieu Arnold Organization: Absolight / The FreeBSD Foundation Message-ID: <9fa67c9b-0cee-3986-2226-e7e0f687cba5@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 11:39:49 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170125084738.GM85666@cicely7.cicely.de> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="skIu9WrRwkr27hqO6URSPMUDxDlc5jJAj" X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 10:39:52 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --skIu9WrRwkr27hqO6URSPMUDxDlc5jJAj Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="n1deLMIXMe9S9FDmrj2QItx1IiTLQheNI"; protected-headers="v1" From: Mathieu Arnold To: ticso@cicely.de, Kurt Jaeger Cc: Bernd Walter , freebsd-arm@freebsd.org, Kurt Jaeger , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <9fa67c9b-0cee-3986-2226-e7e0f687cba5@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: 11.0-RC1 unsupported by ports? References: <20170125042413.GK85666@cicely7.cicely.de> <20170125062045.GS13006@home.opsec.eu> <20170125075459.GL85666@cicely7.cicely.de> <20170125081318.GT13006@home.opsec.eu> <20170125084738.GM85666@cicely7.cicely.de> In-Reply-To: <20170125084738.GM85666@cicely7.cicely.de> --n1deLMIXMe9S9FDmrj2QItx1IiTLQheNI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le 25/01/2017 =C3=A0 09:47, Bernd Walter a =C3=A9crit : > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 09:13:18AM +0100, Kurt Jaeger wrote: >> Hi! >> >>>> 11.0-RC1 was superseded by 11.0-REL, so while that message is a bit >>>> drastic, there's a point to it. >>> With that argument only the latest version would be supported. >> https://www.freebsd.org/releases/ lists the supported releases. >> There are no release candidates listed. >> >>> That said, it is a release candidate and as such one could argue that= >>> there never had been any official support at all. >>> In that case however the message is wrong, because when a support has= >>> ended it implies that there was support. >>> >>> The check in the code is this one: >>> .if (${OPSYS} =3D=3D FreeBSD && (${OSVERSION} < 1003000 || (${OSVERSI= ON} >=3D 1100000 && ${OSVERSION} < 1100122))) || \ >>> (${OPSYS} =3D=3D DragonFly && ${DFLYVERSION} < 400400) >>> >>> It is not about RC as such, it is explicitly about 11.0-RC. >>> My OSVERSION is 1100121. >>> So obviously support starts with the first release. >>> Fair enough, but then the message is still wrong unless it was suppor= ted. >> What's stopping you from upgrading to -REL ? > Buildworld on a raspberry isn't fun - if it works at all. > Even if you crossbuild and just copy the binaries, the wear of > MicroSD cards isn't something you want to test unless you really > have to. If you have other computers running FreeBSD, you can build /usr/obj on the other box (using make buildworld TARGET_ARCH=3Dfoo (you may have to check the exact incantation)) copy the /usr/obj, and only run make installworld. --=20 Mathieu Arnold --n1deLMIXMe9S9FDmrj2QItx1IiTLQheNI-- --skIu9WrRwkr27hqO6URSPMUDxDlc5jJAj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJYiIB1XxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQzQUI2OTc4OUQyRUQxMjEwNjQ0MEJBNUIz QTQ1MTZGMzUxODNDRTQ4AAoJEDpFFvNRg85IqmkQAKv4517qLbH3l7x+/XcWt73J F1MRabCWYW/Zp+6B8+pPFoMftnR1S8qAEU3BAJVnai2O/5uwJofbxO3xdGeoY0em LBdqo81VIYglQiSsDxC21VMbyMxQaJ4HO5ByI0UHiJHDnljJayjqKjhWfFcTI08H 4W7uODxXSO/ZysH+sBxvpSz2Gu1czMQbtq78KTw8ayRAsCc92n9vX+8lSm9YQcLm G4uuAMQqbV1xalzTkQZOM9R0k7THMzTOYBM24yfSHYS2oXAwqJZsxVMMTtkxAlf9 bCz/CcRJGWOK1P22Vjr9Cr/Q2oplTdu/V4SlKShNFhxELvM2/cdD253JNf3F7w4x /ahcFDD/lz2SG7f8b9q7wtVz1Cx/J9RNIIM9kMy+dBp3+Tp9yYkYqKOeUKUy490e TKlzITRK9gbGe+i+0tMRSSl8yg9EIRMFgVI+Sybdixqxj8PBKMLq1FM7s90t5tnJ Vb0TvNVCpcwaJsG5AYmfdRxtgBvn4OyqsB41F287/HZTYzmxucnEYggFqupLJeRN 91i4GjXgAnnKhSHLIQgWA9z9V9DKb0Kt89FTYsQtzZeOvqoX/VYUrCINGebaT5tF Uazj0W2gbG9tOTDXgr6cEZnMO2gC7SnZew0IKBi8mvQOzePjwmyThTmRhDukES/D uhi8jNhEcQ/prA2RnLdS =xnu/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --skIu9WrRwkr27hqO6URSPMUDxDlc5jJAj--