From owner-freebsd-current Wed Mar 28 6:24:43 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from peter3.wemm.org (c1315225-a.plstn1.sfba.home.com [65.0.135.147]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11EBC37B71F; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 06:24:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@netplex.com.au) Received: from mobile.wemm.org (mobile.wemm.org [10.0.0.5]) by peter3.wemm.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f2SEOep30281; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 06:24:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@netplex.com.au) Received: from netplex.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mobile.wemm.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f2SEOYh47811; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 06:24:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@netplex.com.au) Message-Id: <200103281424.f2SEOYh47811@mobile.wemm.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.2 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Doug Barton Cc: karsten@rohrbach.de, Warner Losh , Greg Lehey , Andrew Reilly , "David O'Brien" , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ** HEADS UP ** portmap daemon renamed to rpcbind In-Reply-To: <3AC18E42.DED4D2A5@DougBarton.net> Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 06:24:34 -0800 From: Peter Wemm Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Doug Barton wrote: > "Karsten W. Rohrbach" wrote: > > > the idea is, that if rpcbind takes parameters different from portmap it > > would make sense to call rpcbind rpcbind because people's boxes will > > start to barf when rpcbind is called portmap, they make world, and skip > > reading the rpcbind paragraph in UPDATING ;-) > > > > does this make sense? > > Yes. "Takes parameters different from portmap," makes much more sense than > "takes parameters." :) FYI: SYNOPSIS portmap [-d] [-v] SYNOPSIS rpcbind [-dilLs] Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com; peter@netplex.com.au "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message