Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 28 Jun 2011 11:31:29 GMT
From:      Greg Becker <greg@codeconcepts.com>
To:        freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   docs/158387: The tree(3) man should mention the RB_FOREACH_SAFE() API...
Message-ID:  <201106281131.p5SBVTkh031613@red.freebsd.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <201106281140.p5SBe6L4067584@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

>Number:         158387
>Category:       docs
>Synopsis:       The tree(3) man should mention the RB_FOREACH_SAFE() API...
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       low
>Responsible:    freebsd-doc
>State:          open
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:
>Class:          doc-bug
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Tue Jun 28 11:40:05 UTC 2011
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     Greg Becker
>Release:        8.2
>Organization:
CodeConcepts
>Environment:
FreeBSD gromit.codeconcepts.com 8.2-STABLE FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #0: Sun Jun  5 05:09:04 CDT 2011     root@gromit.codeconcepts.com:/build/obj/usr/src/sys/GROMIT  amd64

>Description:
The tree(2) man page mentions neither the RB_FOREACH_SAFE() nor the RB_FOREACH_REVERSE_SAFE(), yet they are clearly included in /usr/include/sys/tree.h.  Not a problem for anyone familiar with the API, but useful to those reading man pages to understand the scope its scope and capabilities.  Also, good for completeness :-)

>How-To-Repeat:

>Fix:


>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201106281131.p5SBVTkh031613>