Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:10:18 +0100 From: Stas Verberkt <legolas@legolasweb.nl> To: <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: When Is The Ports Tree Going To Be =?UTF-8?Q?Updated=3F?= Message-ID: <05eafe033134e0771d54dec2d9388c8f@homey.local> In-Reply-To: <loom.20121126T120530-186@post.gmane.org> References: <50B2A57A.3050500@tundraware.com> <50B2A8D8.90301@FreeBSD.org> <50B2AA07.8090103@tundraware.com> <201211251856.40381.lumiwa@gmail.com> <50B2BEE1.9030903@tundraware.com> <loom.20121126T120530-186@post.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
jb schreef op : > Tim Daneliuk <tundra <at> tundraware.com> writes: > >> ... >> > I use portsnap fetch update and it works... >> >> Ah, maybe that was the problem. That works for me as well. > > Well, not quite ... > I think, after the security incident, you had to obtain a fresh snapshot of the ports tree, i.e. you had to do "portsnap fetch extract" before usual service continued. May this be your problem?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?05eafe033134e0771d54dec2d9388c8f>