From owner-freebsd-arch Thu Nov 30 23:24:39 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from panzer.kdm.org (panzer.kdm.org [216.160.178.169]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05A4037B400; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 23:24:37 -0800 (PST) Received: (from ken@localhost) by panzer.kdm.org (8.9.3/8.9.1) id AAA11249; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 00:24:36 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from ken) Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2000 00:24:36 -0700 From: "Kenneth D. Merry" To: Alfred Perlstein Cc: Bosko Milekic , Andrew Gallatin , arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: zero copy code review Message-ID: <20001201002436.E10772@panzer.kdm.org> References: <14886.63486.157224.937225@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <20001130203407.I8051@fw.wintelcom.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <20001130203407.I8051@fw.wintelcom.net>; from alfred@FreeBSD.ORG on Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 08:34:08PM -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 20:34:08 -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > * Bosko Milekic [001130 19:18] wrote: > > > > Furthermore, I wonder if Alfred is gutsy enough ( :-) ) to raise his > > voice and let us know how much this may interefere with the adding of > > locks to sockets in the uipc subsystem, and possibly the stack as well. > > Alfred, where are the potential problems? (As you've already written a > > portion of the latter, I assume you're very well aware)... > > This will be somewhat of a large setback for me, but I'm sure I can > work around it. If not it will have to go. If you need explanations of things, feel free to let Drew or me know. Hopefully this won't be a major roadblock for your changes. Ken -- Kenneth Merry ken@kdm.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message