From owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Thu Aug 24 14:42:17 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E79DDE1162 for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2017 14:42:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lf0-x229.google.com (mail-lf0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1D927F4F0; Thu, 24 Aug 2017 14:42:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lf0-x229.google.com with SMTP id i188so3818385lfg.2; Thu, 24 Aug 2017 07:42:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/5SLdXA/ZIycWhuCeoZ/rmjz3TL2AX9NOI+VLmD8nvM=; b=bQsSQdl3M//YbaObydwNqN4/RrjBozvUOOBgZJJ4NWRpD7jSCuPQuwWVIGCPwlvkUb awPPjn+um4e+t/VAL/mcFeY/zXNikxIsyT/oTnMcZ5BM308dk44fpcHwntDYygiqpkM2 FhVi/B7L0R1W6LPNKxajcCc8dMsawGhin3nc7IW+51+lxPgh2fXUcULq6JSQTbgRf5Vq k+0bg61F+SoXFu2snkvW/dCMV2mYOFBXPKg+/jo7f3/10Cy+uJu2pYPlA005MQgSWfAs wusKHJW7wDZsgy4sWoRR3VhgjN5LHPVU2AlkTlxZqfuacgX1hu5AxWJ2TsohZEx2R25z lMxw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/5SLdXA/ZIycWhuCeoZ/rmjz3TL2AX9NOI+VLmD8nvM=; b=hXFSrkgc/IzjOTOkNGbgyJ7vG/UF47OLTvR+R217ZE1SrHC7fYm044NyF9S9mzQUyc 03KCWb4WinecaqWZ0hpj0Euc+7qYX1rk6Rp1OJ/HqMOf7K++ZnqnGsDSN7PfM6SP6meZ KBzihl+OF4hc0Ymv1f0fG/Ke/sNgQojW3m5GE0un27J4HhJAX6ao56Na7+zrtaD/dj5z DkQi2N2joyRSHw+VTpLY13sawyPzVwbm6J7fMc+ruwAm/RC6E4W7Dz1+9h8nHjHn0CB7 BVtSnlwaTPtqS083KHV/UqUzN8Fru752R6oVZ0WweVdorufO4Tkt9uKuTTwUTAGuEokW AOlQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5i2pRwvs28QcYPIHSrMmWPijflLrd7h7j0IT9zIn163NtynUzEk Nb1xbWhGnfci/s+TQSgE0WmZpzE7TW/s X-Received: by 10.46.9.65 with SMTP id 62mr2601245ljj.177.1503585733314; Thu, 24 Aug 2017 07:42:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.25.21.225 with HTTP; Thu, 24 Aug 2017 07:42:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <71697463-4E52-4B46-B60B-00BDD87D8A2C@FreeBSD.org> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=C3=ADa?= Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 16:42:12 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Runaway process in -CURRENT To: Dimitry Andric Cc: FreeBSD Hackers Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 14:42:17 -0000 On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 11:14 AM, Fernando Apestegu=C3=ADa wrote: > > > El 24 ago. 2017 10:58, "Dimitry Andric" escribi=C3=B3: > > On 23 Aug 2017, at 23:29, Fernando Apestegu=C3=ADa > wrote: >> >> cad/stepcode is reported as runaway in -CURRENT. > > Where is this report? > > > In the mail that was sent to me it says it's here: > > http://beefy11.nyi.freebsd.org/data/head-i386-default/p448504_s322776/log= s/stepcode-0.8_1.log > > But I can't access that url > Just for the record, I got another email. Log URL: http://beefy11.nyi.freebsd.org/data/head-i386-default/p448640_s322824/logs/= stepcode-0.8_1.log Last lines of the report are these: /stepcode-0.8/src/cldai -I/wrkdirs/usr/ports/cad/stepcode/work/stepcode-0.8/src/cleditor -I/wrkdirs/usr/ports/cad/stepcode/work/stepcode-0.8/src/clutils -I/wrkdirs/usr/ports/cad/stepcode/work/stepcode-0.8/src/clstepcore -I/wrkdirs/usr/ports/cad/stepcode/work/stepcode-0.8/src/base -I/wrkdirs/usr/ports/cad/stepcode/work/stepcode-0.8/src/base/judy/src -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector -fno-strict-aliasing -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector -fno-strict-aliasing -fPIC -pedantic -W -Wall -Wundef -Wfloat-equal -Wshadow -Winline -Wno-long-long -MD -MT schemas/sdai_wip210e3/CMakeFiles/sdai_wip210e3.dir/SdaiAP210_ELECTRONIC_ASS= EMBLY_INTERCONNECT_AND_PACKAGING_DESIGN_MIM_LF_unity_types.cc.o -MF schemas/sdai_wip210e3/CMakeFiles/sdai_wip210e3.dir/SdaiAP210_ELECTRONIC= _ASSEMBLY_INTERCONNECT_AND_PACKAGING_DESIGN _MIM_LF_unity_types.cc.o.d -o schemas/sdai_wip210e3/CMakeFiles/sdai_wip210e3.dir/SdaiAP210_ELECTRONIC_ASS= EMBLY_INTERCONNECT_AND_PACKAGING_DESIGN_MIM_LF_unity_types.cc.o -c schemas/sdai_wip210e3/SdaiAP210_ELECTRONIC_ASSEMBLY_INTERCONNECT_AND_PAC= KAGING_DESIGN_MIM_LF_unity_types.cc [411/421] /usr/bin/c++ -DSC_SDAI_UNITY_BUILD -Dsdai_wip210e3_EXPORTS -I/wrkdirs/usr/ports/cad/stepcode/work/stepcode-0.8/include -Iinclude -Ischemas/sdai_wip210e3 -I/wrkdirs/usr/ports/cad/stepcode/work/stepcode-0.8/src/cldai -I/wrkdirs/usr/ports/cad/stepcode/work/stepcode-0.8/src/cleditor -I/wrkdirs/usr/ports/cad/stepcode/work/stepcode-0.8/src/clutils -I/wrkdirs/usr/ports/cad/stepcode/work/stepcode-0.8/src/clstepcore -I/wrkdirs/usr/ports/cad/stepcode/work/stepcode-0.8/src/base -I/wrkdirs/usr/ports/cad/stepcode/work/stepcode-0.8/src/base/judy/src -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector -fno-strict-aliasing -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector -fno-strict-aliasing -fPIC -pedantic -W -Wall -Wundef -Wfloat-equal -Wshadow -Winline -Wno-long-long -MD -MT schemas/sdai_wip210e3/CMakeFiles/sdai_wip210e3.dir/SdaiAll.cc.o -MF schemas/sdai_wip210e3/CMakeFiles/sdai_wip210e3.dir/SdaiAll.cc.o.d -o schemas/sdai_wip210e3/CMakeFiles/sdai_wip210e3.dir/SdaiAll.cc.o -c schemas/sdai_wip210e3/SdaiAll.cc =3D=3D=3D=3D>> Killing runaway build after 7200 seconds with no output > > >> It seems to take >> forever to compile chemas/sdai_wip210e3/SdaiAll.cc. (it uses clang >> 5.0.0) > > Not for me, it compiles in slightly more than 2 seconds: > > clang-4.0.0 2.20 real 2.11 user 0.08 sys > clang-5.0.0-r311219 2.16 real 2.00 user 0.15 sys > > Are you using any special CFLAGS or CPUTYPE settings? > > > Sorry, I should have started this clearly: I'm receiving this reports fro= m > the project ports builders, but I can reproduce it in my machine with > -CURRENT in VirtualBox. > > No special flags on my setup though > > > >> What strikes me is that it compiles in my machine in about 10 minutes >> in 11.1 with clang4.0 > > Are you talking about the build of the entire port, or just that one > source file? The whole port takes quite a while to build, but it does > finish for me. > > > The entire port. > > > -Dimitry > >