Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 16:16:17 +0200 From: Alexey Zelkin <phantom@freebsd.org> To: Ceri Davies <ceri@freebsd.org> Cc: Colin Percival <colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk> Subject: Re: www/en/releases/5.2R/todo.sgml illegible Message-ID: <20031125161617.A53659@phantom.cris.net> In-Reply-To: <20031125131944.GJ66785@submonkey.net>; from ceri@freebsd.org on Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 01:19:45PM %2B0000 References: <5.0.2.1.1.20031125130644.02dd4bb0@popserver.sfu.ca> <20031125131944.GJ66785@submonkey.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
hi, I agree that orange is more preferable than yellow. Please also check all related lists and fix colors there too. On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 01:19:45PM +0000, Ceri Davies wrote: > On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 01:11:00PM +0000, Colin Percival wrote: > > Could I suggest the following patch? Yellow text on a white background > > is rather hard to read. > > > > --- www/en/releases/5.2R/todo.sgml > > +++ www/en/releases/5.2R/todo.sgml > > @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ > > <!ENTITY status.na "<font color=green>N/A</font>"> > > <!ENTITY status.done "<font color=green>Done</font>"> > > <!ENTITY status.wip "<font color=blue>In progress</font>"> > > -<!ENTITY status.untested "<font color=yellow>Needs testing</font>"> > > +<!ENTITY status.untested "<font color=green>Needs testing</font>"> > > <!ENTITY status.new "<font color=red>Not done</font>"> > > <!ENTITY status.unknown "<font color=red>Unknown</font>"> > > ]> > > In true bikeshed fashion, I have to disagree on your choice of colour. > Using green here implies that that task is done - I'd rather use > orange/amber but I don't know if that works in most/any browsers or not. > > Ceri > > --
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031125161617.A53659>