Date: Tue, 22 Apr 1997 18:28:38 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: Martin Jangowski <bsd@birdland.rhein-neckar.de> Cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>, stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is there a perceived need for a 2.1.8 release? Message-ID: <E0wJpvK-00008q-00@rover.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 19 Apr 1997 18:54:07 %2B0200." <Pine.BSF.3.94.970419185000.21106A-100000@birdland.rhein-neckar.de> References: <Pine.BSF.3.94.970419185000.21106A-100000@birdland.rhein-neckar.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <Pine.BSF.3.94.970419185000.21106A-100000@birdland.rhein-neckar.de> Martin Jangowski writes: : Of course! As master over 11 heavily loaded machines, all running 2.1.7.1 : very successfully, I can't see myself changing them all to 2.2.x. I think : that 2.1.7.1 is going to stay for a long time, so I'd appreciate the idea : of fixing security bugs in the 2.1.x-line very much. I plan on continuing to integrate security fixes into 2.1.x that I make to -current and 2.2.x until such time as it is obvious no body cares (generally that means that I get/see 1 request for this sort of thing every month or two). Sadly, I have stopped any other activity in the 2.1.x branch. I've moved all the machines I have at that rev to newer versions a while ago and am happy at that rev. Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E0wJpvK-00008q-00>