From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 8 08:23:48 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3AC51065671 for ; Tue, 8 Jul 2008 08:23:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phoemix@harmless.hu) Received: from marvin.harmless.hu (marvin.harmless.hu [195.56.55.204]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FFB48FC15 for ; Tue, 8 Jul 2008 08:23:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phoemix@harmless.hu) Received: from fw.publishing.hu ([82.131.181.62] helo=twoflower.in.publishing.hu) by marvin.harmless.hu with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1KG8E2-0001xX-Fb; Tue, 08 Jul 2008 10:07:02 +0200 Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 10:07:01 +0200 From: CZUCZY Gergely To: mike Message-ID: <20080708100701.57031cda@twoflower.in.publishing.hu> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Harmless Digital X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.11; i386-portbld-freebsd6.3) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/bR7m6HPa7YP/lF_wrVExvqe"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Thinking of using ZFS/FBSD for a backup system X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2008 08:23:48 -0000 --Sig_/bR7m6HPa7YP/lF_wrVExvqe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I've already made a backup system exactly in the scheme you've just describ= ed, in order to replace dirvish. It worked quite well, but the ZFS port was so experimental that we couldn't go on. No matter how much i've tried to finetune ZFS it kept in randomly rebooting= in every 1-2-3 weeks, and a few backup cycles were lost. Regardless of this, the system worked quite well. If ZFS were stable, this easily could be our backup system. ZFS is great, awesome, but a bit unrelia= ble on FreeBSD, still needs some work. On Mon, 7 Jul 2008 23:15:54 -0700 mike wrote: > I administer a handful of servers - both for work and for my side > business. Right now I am rsyncing /home each server back each night > from the server to my own machine at home. >=20 > I'd like to add in snapshots, so I want to sanity check here - I > wouldn't be doing much more than: >=20 > - creating a separate zfs filesystem for each server > - creating a nightly snapshot after the rsync finishes >=20 > Since I cannot change the filesystems on the remote machines now (and > all run Linux anyway), this essentially gives me the ability to have > daily snapshots of each machine at my fingertips should I need it - > correct? >=20 > Just wanted to sanity check here before investing some money and time > into this solution... >=20 > Also if anyone wants to reply to me off list with hardware that works > well for FBSD 7 + ZFS I'd be grateful :) >=20 > Thanks in advance. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-fs@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --=20 =C3=9Cdv=C3=B6lettel, Czuczy Gergely Harmless Digital Bt mailto: gergely.czuczy@harmless.hu Tel: +36-30-9702963 --Sig_/bR7m6HPa7YP/lF_wrVExvqe Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFIcyAlzrC0WyuMkpsRAqhyAJ9Yoa9QR9/MXlrHYQ3B2IDHP/wC1ACff3Gu fi2GC29BnGTddlbZGevOKmY= =idKx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/bR7m6HPa7YP/lF_wrVExvqe--