From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 30 17:33:14 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4472316A4CE for ; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 17:33:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de (krusty.dt.E-Technik.Uni-Dortmund.DE [129.217.163.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63FAD43FAF for ; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 17:33:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ma@dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de) Received: from m2a2.dyndns.org (krusty.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.163.1])77CF315662 for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 02:33:07 +0100 (CET) Received: by merlin.emma.line.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id E9964A00F4; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 02:33:05 +0100 (CET) To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Matthias Andree Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 02:33:05 +0100 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Why does ldconfig insist on a trailing number? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 01:33:14 -0000 Hi, ldconfig is documented as only looking at files that have some version number after the .so suffix, say, .so.4. This looks rather ugly when the library version is part of the name, as in BerkeleyDB ports. Is there a functional requirement for the trailing version number? If so, what is it? Thanks in advance. -- Matthias Andree Encrypt your mail: my GnuPG key ID is 0x052E7D95