Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 18:45:11 -0600 (CST) From: James Van Artsdalen <james-freebsd-amd64@jrv.org> To: jason+lists.freebsd@lixfeld.ca Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RELENG-5_2_1_RELEASE | make buildkernel | Crypto Message-ID: <200402250045.i1P0jBfg066978@bigtex.jrv.org> In-Reply-To: <CF08F9EC-6726-11D8-86C5-000A95989E4A@lixfeld.ca> (message from Jason Lixfeld on Tue, 24 Feb 2004 19:08:58 -0500) References: <CF08F9EC-6726-11D8-86C5-000A95989E4A@lixfeld.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> From: Jason Lixfeld <jason+lists.freebsd@lixfeld.ca> > Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 19:08:58 -0500 > > Anyone have any ideas? > > options IPSEC #IP security > options IPSEC_ESP #IP security (crypto; define w/ > IPSEC) > options IPSEC_DEBUG #debug for IP security > > su-2.05b# make buildkernel KERNCONF=ESHARA > ... > ... > /usr/src/sys/crypto/blowfish/bf_ecb.c:79: undefined reference to > `BF_encrypt' I'd like to hear back how performance is, to know if assembly code is worthwhile. --- sys/conf/files.amd64.orig Mon Nov 17 02:58:16 2003 +++ sys/conf/files.amd64 Mon Feb 2 23:08:43 2004 @@ -123,3 +123,10 @@ compat/ia32/ia32_sigtramp.S optional ia32 compat/ia32/ia32_sysvec.c optional ia32 kern/imgact_elf32.c optional ia32 +# +crypto/des/des_ecb.c optional netsmbcrypto +crypto/des/des_enc.c optional netsmbcrypto +crypto/des/des_setkey.c optional netsmbcrypto +crypto/blowfish/bf_enc.c optional crypto +crypto/blowfish/bf_enc.c optional ipsec ipsec_esp +crypto/des/des_enc.c optional ipsec ipsec_esp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200402250045.i1P0jBfg066978>