From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 15 08:18:59 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06CC816A418 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2007 08:18:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rakhesh@rakhesh.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90C9813C45D for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2007 08:18:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rakhesh@rakhesh.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id b2so858678nfb for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2007 01:18:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.122.16 with SMTP id u16mr74890huc.1187165936092; Wed, 15 Aug 2007 01:18:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.home.rakhesh.com ( [82.178.137.21]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 37sm4014241hua.2007.08.15.01.18.53 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 15 Aug 2007 01:18:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from obelix.home.rakhesh.com (obelix.home.rakhesh.com [192.168.17.13]) by smtp.home.rakhesh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C839E5080A; Wed, 15 Aug 2007 12:18:26 +0400 (GST) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 12:18:26 +0400 (GST) X-X-Sender: rakhesh@obelix.home.rakhesh.com To: Doug Barton In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20070815121217.D82445@obelix.home.rakhesh.com> References: <20070814214727.P47947@asterix.home.rakhesh.com> <20070815081808.C54184@obelix.home.rakhesh.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed From: Rakhesh Sasidharan Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Unable to get pine-pgp-filters and pinentry-curses to work together X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 08:18:59 -0000 Doug Barton wrote: > On Wed, 15 Aug 2007, Rakhesh Sasidharan wrote: > >> BTW, I ask coz I don't know: as a matter of etiquette, is it a good idea to >> cc the author/ maintainer of the port even if he/ she is subscribed to the >> list? > > I think that both tradition and expediency say "yes." You happened to catch > me on a night when I was reviewing mail on the lists, which (like most > developers) isn't every night. I do place a high priority on mail about my > ports though, especially when both the port and the software are mine. :) Thanks for the info. :) Regards, - Rakhesh http://rakhesh.com/