From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 6 17:39:13 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 750BDFBA; Tue, 6 Aug 2013 17:39:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 374982B35; Tue, 6 Aug 2013 17:39:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-172-70.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.172.70]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2BB13C708; Tue, 6 Aug 2013 19:39:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id r76Hd87a003256; Tue, 6 Aug 2013 19:39:08 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2013 19:39:08 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Devin Teske Subject: Re: .sh script code to determine IPv4 or IPv6 Message-Id: <20130806193908.bb4ff02a.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7202006F51@ltcfiswmsgmb21> References: <51FCE9C7.7020407@a1poweruser.com> <20988.61897.78070.312049@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D720200229A@ltcfiswmsgmb21> <52012235.3050006@ssimicro.com> <20130806184332.ff7f0c4d.freebsd@edvax.de> <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7202006F51@ltcfiswmsgmb21> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: markham breitbach , questions , "Teske, Devin" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2013 17:39:13 -0000 On Tue, 6 Aug 2013 16:50:37 +0000, Teske, Devin wrote: > And yes... to clarify... the port is a mirror of what's in 9.x base. > (however, see my recent notes in a separate reply; TL;DR: port is > 9.x only; proceed only if you know you don't care about the dialog(1) > aspects of the library code). I think it should be relatively unproblematic to fetch the port and only use the subroutines "as is", even if it's just for educational purposes. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...