Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 13 Nov 2013 12:16:45 -0800
From:      Kevin Oberman <rkoberman@gmail.com>
To:        Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-ports-local@be-well.ilk.org>
Cc:        FreeBSD Ports ML <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Best way to make the port install another port
Message-ID:  <CAN6yY1tjwgd7XECMGyPbJ6oFHgfvEGuaqd0Yj=y9Es6ZCmS90g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <44wqkd9rqt.fsf@be-well.ilk.org>
References:  <CAHcXP%2BeZZ3tYXFmUNJhqU%2B69rVhqw-%2Bae7FMZhfz=BZ8XjdqbQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAHcXP%2Bc%2B9g85TJCqrQBoAPuH6tCL=b_WR_jAya%2BcFv-QYUXjyg@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ_iqtaD9kKh-NLn29qH=edf6XStUpzXVm_p3JWwi6icP3EQ9g@mail.gmail.com> <441u2lb9po.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <CAHcXP%2BfHsB68G5AUX=JhST9coJkhcjgaqUMuTGCBAcvzgaorng@mail.gmail.com> <44wqkd9rqt.fsf@be-well.ilk.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Lowell Gilbert <
freebsd-ports-local@be-well.ilk.org> wrote:

> Big Lebowski <spankthespam@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Yes, that was exactly the case - I know about these options, and I know
> how
> > to use them, but somehow RUN_DEPENDS doesnt feel right here. The original
> > port is a standalone piece of software, that can perfectly run without
> the
> > second one. The second one happens to be developed very closely with
> first
> > one, and its a commandline tool for it (but there are other ways to
> access
> > and work on the original port). Therefore RUN_DEPENDS sounds wrong.
> > But if that's what should be used, I'll do so.
>
> Look at it this way; the *option* depends on the second port.
>
>
Take a look at the Makefile for any of the big multimedia ports like vlc or
mplayer. They have a long list of options for different codecs, most of
which create added RUN_DEPENDS.
-- 
R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer
E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAN6yY1tjwgd7XECMGyPbJ6oFHgfvEGuaqd0Yj=y9Es6ZCmS90g>