From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Fri Jul 3 12:46:37 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73DC334D858 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 12:46:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49yvq12ZQ1z4Dn3 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 12:46:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 5682C34DA2B; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 12:46:37 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports-bugs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 564A234DA2A for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 12:46:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49yvq11bwkz4Dt8 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 12:46:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A92BB9EB for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 12:46:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 063Ckan0006300 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 12:46:36 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 063Ckala006299 for ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 12:46:36 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 246915] [NEW PORT] audio/ardour6: Multichannel digital audio workstation (6.x) Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2020 12:46:36 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: feature, needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: beerml@sigma6audio.de X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2020 12:46:37 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D246915 --- Comment #11 from Michael Beer --- (In reply to daniel.engberg.lists from comment #9) -- Main site and GitHub lists license as GPLv2 not GPLv2+? I don't think I added the '+' myself (in the ardour5 port). -- Why is SSE enforced on i386 and amd64? For amd64 it's probably enabled by default in the compiler anyway. Performance wise Ardour is not suitable for i386 machines without SSE in my opinion. But newer machines running 32-bit OS benefit a lot by using SSE. (I think SSE is available since PentiumII) -- Is it possible to add unit tests (make test) to the port? Personally I see no need. But if you step in and provide a patch you are welcome of course. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=