Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 04 Oct 2003 19:52:54 +0200
From:      Marcin Gryszkalis <mg@fork.pl>
To:        Roderick van Domburg <r.s.a.vandomburg@student.utwente.nl>
Cc:        freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: When to use setup keyword?
Message-ID:  <3F7F08F6.3050908@fork.pl>
In-Reply-To: <007d01c38a9e$73883cc0$6ba55982@gog>
References:  <006b01c38a90$dea3b420$6ba55982@gog> <3F7EFDFA.4060703@fork.pl> <007d01c38a9e$73883cc0$6ba55982@gog>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2003-10-04 19:39, Roderick van Domburg wrote:
> I know, but HTTP/1.1 does allow for ``threaded sessions'', so to speak. What
> I don't know without glancing at any RFC's is whether HTTP/1.1 clients open
> multiple sockets on port 80 or several sockets in the dynamic range.
I've never heard about http service opening ports other than those explicitly
specified (usually 80). Client can open several paralell connections to
the port.

> Hence my question: which services require the setup keyword and which don't?
I'd say - every TCP-based service require either setup/established rules or
statefull rules.

regards
-- 
Marcin Gryszkalis
jabber jid:mg@chrome.pl
gg:2532994
http://fork.pl



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3F7F08F6.3050908>