From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Jan 11 13:06:15 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id NAA10575 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 11 Jan 1995 13:06:15 -0800
Received: from UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU (root@UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU [129.7.1.11]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with SMTP id NAA10565 for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed, 11 Jan 1995 13:06:03 -0800
Received: from Taronga.COM by UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU with UUCP id AA21000
  (5.67a/IDA-1.5); Wed, 11 Jan 1995 14:35:03 -0600
Received: by bonkers.taronga.com (smail2.5p) id AA01816; 11 Jan 95 13:21:05 CST (Wed)
Received: (from peter@localhost) by bonkers.taronga.com (8.6.8/8.6.6) id NAA01813; Wed, 11 Jan 1995 13:21:05 -0600
From: Peter da Silva <peter@bonkers.taronga.com>
Message-Id: <199501111921.NAA01813@bonkers.taronga.com>
Subject: Re: S/Key - What gives?
To: mark@grondar.za (Mark Murray)
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 1995 13:21:05 -0600 (CST)
Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <199501111712.TAA27382@grunt.grondar.za> from "Mark Murray" at Jan 11, 95 07:12:28 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 221       
Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>    But the absence of the s/key bit already told him he's barking up the
>    wrong tree. Maybe a random number should be thrown in as a confuser?

Yeh, the TIC toolkit generates a bogus challenge string for this case.