Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2003 16:14:30 -0800 From: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> To: deischen@FreeBSD.org Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/ia64/ia64 machdep.c src/sys/ia64/include ucontext.h src/lib/libpthread/arch/ia64/include pthread_md.h Message-ID: <20031208001430.GA87303@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10312071900280.25098-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com> References: <200312072047.hB7KlXp0099493@repoman.freebsd.org> <Pine.GSO.4.10.10312071900280.25098-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Dec 07, 2003 at 07:03:50PM -0500, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > Can we go back to using per-thread locks for the spinlocks instead > of the KSE locks now (go back to rev 1.18 of thr_spinlock.c)? Yes, by all means. -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031208001430.GA87303>