From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 3 16:23:44 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46A3E16A41F for ; Thu, 3 Nov 2005 16:23:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (vc4-2-0-87.dsl.netrack.net [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D899043D46 for ; Thu, 3 Nov 2005 16:23:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1] (may be forged)) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jA3GNAih011087; Thu, 3 Nov 2005 09:23:10 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2005 09:23:25 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <20051103.092325.119936663.imp@bsdimp.com> To: babkin@users.sourceforge.net, babkin@verizon.net From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <20669850.1131022662391.JavaMail.root@vms061.mailsrvcs.net> References: <20669850.1131022662391.JavaMail.root@vms061.mailsrvcs.net> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0 (harmony.bsdimp.com [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 03 Nov 2005 09:23:10 -0700 (MST) Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, scottl@samsco.org Subject: Re: locking in a device driver X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2005 16:23:44 -0000 In message: <20669850.1131022662391.JavaMail.root@vms061.mailsrvcs.net> Sergey Babkin writes: : Maybe it can be fixed in the kernel without : too much trouble. It already is in libthr and libposix. They already use execution contexts to map M threads onto N contexts. libc_r is being retired and not worth the effort to modernize. Since there's really no good threading paradigm in 4.x and since it is also being retired, I don't think it is worth the effort there. Warner