Date: Wed, 24 Nov 1999 10:25:06 -0700 From: Brendan Conoboy <synk@swcp.com> To: Brian Fundakowski Feldman <green@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: new IPFW Message-ID: <19991124102506.A14069@inago.swcp.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9911240047480.40905-100000@green.dyndns.org>; from Brian Fundakowski Feldman on Wed, Nov 24, 1999 at 01:33:04AM -0500 References: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9911240047480.40905-100000@green.dyndns.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Nov 24, 1999 at 01:33:04AM -0500, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote: > I've finally sat myself down to take the first step in getting the new > IPFW done. I'll start by listing some of the different ideas I've had, > CC'd to arch@ so that I pick up the audience of people I need. Perhaps everybody but me knows the answer to this one: Why not build off of ipfilter? I've chosen ipf over ipfw for the last couple of years because ipf already had state, nat proxies, route intervention, etc. Since 3.x freebsd has carried support for both. Does ipf have something really ugly under the hood that people don't want to work with? -Brendan (synk@swcp.com) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ipfw" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19991124102506.A14069>