From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Aug 27 16:33:09 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4B2F10656A6
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 16:33:09 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from lists@opsec.eu)
Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 966018FC0A
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 16:33:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD))
	(envelope-from <lists@opsec.eu>)
	id 1Op1ra-000HI5-HG; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 18:33:10 +0200
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 18:33:10 +0200
From: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu>
To: Glen Barber <glen.j.barber@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20100827163310.GD67795@home.opsec.eu>
References: <4C77DB15.5010501@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4C77DB15.5010501@gmail.com>
Cc: ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: security/clamav: Segmentation fault when running clamav in a
 32-bit jail on a 64-bit host
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 16:33:09 -0000

Hi!

> I have a few clamav instances running in jails on 32-bit hosts without
> any issues.  A few days ago one of these jails was migrated to a 64-bit
> host (8.1-RELEASE), where I noticed clamd (0.96.2_1) segfaults when queried.
> 
> The issue seems specific to 32bit/64bit compatibility.  I have a gdb
> session available here: http://gist.github.com/549964
> 
> Any thoughts on if this is possible?

Try

Bytecode no

in clamd.conf ?

-- 
pi@opsec.eu            +49 171 3101372                        10 years to go !