From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 19 15:27:10 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F35A237B401 for ; Sat, 19 Apr 2003 15:27:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ints.mail.pike.ru (ints.mail.pike.ru [195.9.45.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE9C043FDD for ; Sat, 19 Apr 2003 15:27:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from babolo@cicuta.babolo.ru) Received: (qmail 69705 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2003 22:44:49 -0000 Received: from babolo.ru (HELO cicuta.babolo.ru) (194.58.226.160) by ints.mail.pike.ru with SMTP; 19 Apr 2003 22:44:49 -0000 Received: (nullmailer pid 740 invoked by uid 136); Sat, 19 Apr 2003 22:30:06 -0000 X-ELM-OSV: (Our standard violations) hdr-charset=KOI8-R; no-hdr-encoding=1 In-Reply-To: <20030419203917.GA46312@parodius.com> To: Jeremy Chadwick Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2003 02:30:06 +0400 (MSD) From: "."@babolo.ru X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL99b (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Message-Id: <1050791406.354360.739.nullmailer@cicuta.babolo.ru> cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: BIND-8/9 interface bug? Or is it FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2003 22:27:10 -0000 > A bit hasty -- I didn't realise Len's comment was sent to > me personally. > > > Under what circumstances would the primary request data from > > > the secondary on it's _public_ IP? > > > > NOTIFY "queries" from master to slave go to the IP of zone NS records If zone has @ NS some.server @ NS another.server then after reload of this zone NOTIFY is sent to some.server and another.server