Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 12 Jan 2002 01:20:14 +0200
From:      Andy Fawcett <andy@athame.co.uk>
To:        Joseph Garcia <bear@unix.homeip.net>, questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Is Mesa really needed for QT 2.3.1?
Message-ID:  <200201120115.14222@zappa.athame.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20020111142747.Y75924-100000@we-24-126-232-105.we.mediaone.net>
References:  <20020111142747.Y75924-100000@we-24-126-232-105.we.mediaone.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Saturday 12 January 2002 00:30, Joseph Garcia wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I'm questioning if Mesa3D is required for QT 2.3.1 considering that
> the configure args say -no-opengl.

The Qt port builds two versions of the library. One is built with Mesa 
support, the other not.

> I'm kinda confused about this.
> Also, what's the best way to contact the maintainer to let him know
> that there's a new version of QT (2.3.2 is the latest maintenance
> release). 

He knows.

It's not been upgraded because "2.3.2 is broken". It causes problems 
with KDE, so the port remains at 2.3.1

For reference, the maintainer should be listed in the Makefile for the 
port.

Andy

-- 
Andy Fawcett      |   "In an open world without walls and fences,
andy@athame.co.uk |      we wouldn't need Windows and Gates."
tap@lspace.org    |                              -- anon

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200201120115.14222>