From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Jan 11 15:20:32 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from crucible.athame.co.uk (guru164.netsonic.fi [194.29.193.164]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B4DE37B405 for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 15:20:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from zappa.athame.co.uk ([10.134.28.148] helo=there) by crucible.athame.co.uk with smtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 16PAy4-0008U4-00; Sat, 12 Jan 2002 01:20:12 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Andy Fawcett Message-Id: <200201120115.14222@zappa.athame.co.uk> To: Joseph Garcia , questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is Mesa really needed for QT 2.3.1? Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2002 01:20:14 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] References: <20020111142747.Y75924-100000@we-24-126-232-105.we.mediaone.net> In-Reply-To: <20020111142747.Y75924-100000@we-24-126-232-105.we.mediaone.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Saturday 12 January 2002 00:30, Joseph Garcia wrote: > Hello. > > I'm questioning if Mesa3D is required for QT 2.3.1 considering that > the configure args say -no-opengl. The Qt port builds two versions of the library. One is built with Mesa support, the other not. > I'm kinda confused about this. > Also, what's the best way to contact the maintainer to let him know > that there's a new version of QT (2.3.2 is the latest maintenance > release). He knows. It's not been upgraded because "2.3.2 is broken". It causes problems with KDE, so the port remains at 2.3.1 For reference, the maintainer should be listed in the Makefile for the port. Andy -- Andy Fawcett | "In an open world without walls and fences, andy@athame.co.uk | we wouldn't need Windows and Gates." tap@lspace.org | -- anon To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message