From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 13 17:10:21 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 157F316A4B3 for ; Mon, 13 Oct 2003 17:10:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sizone.org (mortar.sizone.org [65.126.154.242]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAD3543FBF for ; Mon, 13 Oct 2003 17:10:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dgilbert@daveg.ca) Received: by sizone.org (Postfix, from userid 66) id 7390C3026E; Mon, 13 Oct 2003 20:10:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: by canoe.dclg.ca (Postfix, from userid 101) id 5D2A41D1EAF; Mon, 13 Oct 2003 20:10:17 -0400 (EDT) From: David Gilbert MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16267.16104.137665.580328@canoe.dclg.ca> Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 20:10:16 -0400 To: Peter Wemm In-Reply-To: <20031013230504.C54F32A8DF@canning.wemm.org> References: <1066086068.642.104.camel@leguin> <20031013230504.C54F32A8DF@canning.wemm.org> X-Mailer: VM 7.14 under 21.4 (patch 12) "Portable Code" XEmacs Lucid cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: David Gilbert Subject: Re: XFree86-4-clients port broken. X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 00:10:21 -0000 >>>>> "Peter" == Peter Wemm writes: Peter> Eric Anholt wrote: >> On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 15:51, Peter Wemm wrote: > David Gilbert >> wrote: > > I don't really have a clue where to look for this fix as >> there seems > > to be a serious amount of magic going into the >> divided XFree86-4 port > > builds, but my XFree86-4-clients port >> fails saying: >> > > >> > > make: don't know how to make >> /usr/ports/x11/XFree86-4-clients/work/xc/exp Peter> orts >> > /lib/libfntstubs.a. Stop >> > >> > I ran into this on my amd64 box too. Is yours an i386? >> >> This is a problem on ref5, too. I am testing a fix right now. The >> confusing part is I can't find any change I (or anyone else) has >> made that would have caused this. Peter> Does the port have any exposure to make(1) at all? Its been Peter> futzed with fairly recently. I know it's supposed to use Peter> gmake, but perhaps there are still some "make" references? If you look at the port, it uses make fairly extensively now. The Makefile (from my limited understanding) seems to charge into building the port without calling gmake by adding sub directories much like the /usr/src makefile seems to do. Dave. -- ============================================================================ |David Gilbert, Independent Contractor. | Two things can only be | |Mail: dave@daveg.ca | equal if and only if they | |http://daveg.ca | are precisely opposite. | =========================================================GLO================